| "The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed, for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more easily deceived that they are consciously and intentionally bad. The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies but would be ashamed to tell big ones." - Adolf Hitler, from MEIN KAMPF |
Update: 16 July 1997
Only Religion is based in assertion and faith.
Everything else requires EVIDENCE.
To establish a LIE, one requires EVIDENCE
To establish the TRUTH, one requires EVIDENCE
| Prosecutor Marcia Clark |
|---|
| Prosecutor Christopher Darden |
| Detective Mark Fuhrman |
| Washington Post, 8 May 1997
The Los Angeles Police Department, after spending some $800,000 and interviewing some 220 people, has concluded that Mark Fuhrman, the so-called rogue cop, had made up much if not all of what he told the aspiring screenwriter Laura Hart McKinny. In fact, to quote from the Los Angeles Times' account of the LAPD report, "none of Fuhrman's allegations of brutality, racism and excessive force were sustained." That, of course, is what Fuhrman has been saying all along. He concocted much of what he told McKinny in the 14 taped interviews she had with him over a nine-year period -- 1985 to 1994. She was looking to write a screenplay about a rogue cop, and so Fuhrman, no fool he, gave her the rogue cop she wanted. He also had an affair with her, he says in his book "Murder in Brentwood," and I mention that only to suggest a motive. Sometimes a man tells a woman what she wants to hear. The Los Angeles Police Department clears Detective Mark Fuhrman's "past" by concluding that a convicted perjuror is only a liar. |
| Detective Phillip Vannatter |
| Attorney Daniel Petrocelli |
| PETROCELLI {Civil Trial Summation}: Now, Mr. Baker told you earlier today, Mark Fuhrman found all the evidence in the case. That's just false. What trial has he been attending? Mark Fuhrman didn't find any of the evidence in this case except the glove at Rockingham. He found nothing at Bundy. Nothing. -- Civil Trial Summation Based on this statement, all discussion of Detective Fuhrman's observations, and the associated notes, can be disregarded. As a result, the only writen report associated with the Bundy Crime Scene belongs to a patrolman -- Officer Robert Riske. Aside from Riske & Fuhrman, no other officer associated with this case made a contemporaneous record of their observations, or activities. Further, we know that NONE of the Senior Detectives made any record of their activities at Bundy. FUHRMAN {Larry King Live, 24 February 1997}: No. I'm going to rightfully go to take some of the responsibility for that. Of course, I played right into the defense's hands. Unknowingly I did that, and maybe a little knowingly. So I'm going to shoulder that responsibility, but the thing that really drives me crazy and, I think, the thing that really got me through this last 2 1/2 years was knowing that myself and my partner did a real good job the first day of this case, and found most of the crucial pieces of evidence. |
| PETROCELLI {Larry King Live, 14 July 1997}: Well, I don't know that Marcia complained about the jury in the criminal case, but what Simpson is saying is, in effect, that even though I'm an innocent man, I can't get a fair trial from White Americans. What is he saying? If he is innocent, it ought not to make a difference what the color of your skin is. If you're sitting on the jury and he's innocent, that's the only thing he ought to be concerned with.
Marcia Clark {"Without a Doubt", page 184&5}: ...Vincent Bugliosi, who actually faulted us for moving the trial from Santa Monica. ... To Vincent Bugliosi and those who share his worldview, a good prosecutor is apparently a slick operator who works the angles. And the prescribed angle in this case would have been to steer clear of dark skins, particularly those belonging to middle-aged black women. Sounds ugly---because it is ugly. As well as impractical, unethical, and unconscionable. In a talkshow interview, after the civil verdict, Vincent Bugliosi {1997} boasted that Daniel Petrocelli used his book, OUTRAGE, as a road map for the Civil prosecution. Vincent Bugliosi publically boasts, Daniel Petrocelli used his book as a guide line for conducting the Civil Case. The key element -- established by LADA jury consultant, Don Vinson -- was to exclude middle aged black females from the jury. Is it a coincidence that Petrocelli waited until the jury had begun deliberations before taking action to remove the jury's only middle aged black female? Certainly, when the jury pool is 30-40 percent black, one would expect the jury to contain four or five blacks. |
Our servers are provided by GEOCITIES to whom we are exceedingly grateful.
Launch Date 1 April 1997
Justice is not an April Fool's Day Joke
Alternate servers are provided by CYBERCITY
Our thanks to: Source Interactive Network, LLC,
for the use of their HTML & Graphics editing facilities.
| ||||
